Places the opinions of posters who have never studied any forensic science in any capacity, and Tricia herself has never studied forensic science, above those with actual scientific experts, and she calls this "justice" RDI of course are not interested in justice, just some bizarre crucify the Ramsey lynch mob and smear campaign Neiher tricia griffith delmar england cherokee cynic over at forumsforjustice or websleuth are truthfully representing the scientific value of that forensic evidenceīack in the day roy23 on websleuth would emphasize this with no success to that cult mobĪnd one way of identifying this suspect as shown in the recent success of GSK and Michelle Welch is to do a geneological DNA analysis.
They find handwriting samples that experts say is a match to the Jonbenet handwriting ransom note,Īs i mentioned previously, in the judgment of highly qualified and trained forensic DNA scientists, trained and qualified under the DaubertĭNA is evidence, it is evidence an intruder committed the sexual assault and murder of JonBenet Ramsey They find a missing piece of paintbrush that exactly matches the missing piece that was used to fashion the garrote from Patsy's paintbrush tote. the cord and tape has fiber and trace evidence that exactly matches the ligature and tape found in the crime scene Suppose they find nylon cord identical to the cord found on Jonbenet in the suspect's home, as well as tape identical to the tape found on Jonbenet's mouth. Imagine they find this suspect identified via DNA has hi-tech shoes that exactly matches the shoe print found in the basement near Jonbenet's body was found. Is this person a suspect and should they be investigated? Suppose they identify the person whose DNA was actually found on Jonbenet's clothing. Suppose that they do a geneological DNA check on the DNA and through ancestry and related kin DNA, they find a person whose DNA is related to the DNA found on JonBenet Ramsey. No one can show one scintilla of evidence of an intruder. Anti-K, this whole forum has example after example after example that an intruder did not commit this crime.
0 kommentar(er)
